Artificial reefs: “Attraction versus Production”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5935/1809-2667.20110010Keywords:
Artificial reefs, Attraction, Production, ManagementAbstract
The production of fish is the most common reason for the construction and installation of an artificial reef. More recently, environmental concerns and conservation of biological resources have been instrumental to the formulation of new goals of the research. One of the issues to be resolved is the biological function of “attraction vs. production” as a result of the use of artificial reefs. The uncertainty as to the answer to the question whether the artificial reefs will or not benefit the development of fish stocks could be solved if the artificial reefs would be managed as marine protected areas.Downloads
References
ARENA, P. T; JORDAN, L. K. B; SPIELER, R. E. Fish assemblages on sunken vessels and natural reefs in southeast Florida, USA. Hydrobiologia, v.580, p. 157-171, 2007.
BOHNSACK, J. A. Are high densities of fishes at artificial reefs the result of habitat limitation or behavioral preference? Bulletin of Marine Science, v.44, n. 2, p. 631-645, 1989.
BOHNSACK, J. A.; ECKLUND, A-M.; SZMANT, A. L. Artificial reef research: Is there more than the attraction-production issue? Fisheries, v.22, n. 4, p. 14-16, 1997.
BOHNSACK, J. A.; HARPER, D. E.; McCLELLAN, D. B.; HULSBECK, M. Effects of reef size on colonization and assemblage structure of fishes at artificial reefs off southeastern Florida, U.S.A. Bulletin of Marine Science, v.55, p. 796-823, 1994.
BOHNSACK, J. A.; SUTHERLAND, D. L. Artificial reef research: a review with recommendations for future priorities. Bulletin of Marine Science, v.37, p. 11-39, 1985.
BRICKHILL, J. M.; LEE, S. Y.; CONNOLLY, R. M. Fishes associated with artificial reefs: attributing changes to attraction or production using novel approaches. Journal of Fish Biology, v.67, n.B, p. 53-71, 2005.
BUCKLEY, R. M. Habitat enhancement and urban recreational fishing. In: ITRI, F.M.D. (Ed.). Artificial reefs: marine and freshwater applications. Michigan: Lewis Publishers, Inc., 1985.p. 365-382.
CARE. California Artificial Reef Enhancement Program, 2007. Disponível em: http:///www.calreefs.org/research/index. Acesso em: 29 jun. 2009.
CARR, M. H.; HIXON, M. A. Artificial reefs: the importance of comparisons with natural reefs. Special issue on artificial reef management. Fisheries, v.22, n.4, p. 28-33, 1997.
CHOU, L. M. Artificial reefs of southeast Ásia – do they enhance or degrade the marine environment? Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, v. 44, p. 45-52, 1997.
CLAUDET, J.; PELLETIER, D. Marine protected areas and artificial reefs: a review of the interactions between management and scientific studies. Aquatic Living Resources, v.17, p. 129-138, 2004.
CRUZ, R.; BRITO, R; DIAZ, E.; LALANA, R. Ecologia de la langosta (Panulirus argus) al SE de la isla de la Juventud. I. colonizacion de arrecifes artificiales. Revista de Investigaciones Marinas, v.8, p. 3-17, 1986.
DeMARTINI, E. E.; ROBERTS, D. A.; ANDERSON, T. W. Contrasting patterns of fish density and adundance at an artificial rock reef and a cobble-bottom kelp forest. Bulletin of Marine Science, v.44, p. 881-892, 1989.
ECKLUND, A. M. The effects of post-settlement predation and resource limitation on reef fish assemblages. Dissertation (Doctoral) - University of Miami, Coral Glabes, Florida, 1996.
EMERY, B. M.; WASHBURN, L.; LOVE, M. S.; NISHIMOTO, M. M.; OHLMANN, J. C. Do oil and gas platforms off California reduce recruitment of bocacio (Sebastes paucispinis) to natural habitat? An analysis based on trajectories derived from high-frequency radar. Fishery Bulletin, v.104, p. 391-400, 2006.
GROSSMAN, G. D.; JONES, G. P.; SEAMAN, W. Jr. Do artificial reefs increase regional fish production? A review of existing data. Special issue on artificial reef management. Fisheries, v. 22, n.4, p. 17-23, 1997.
HERRNKIND, W. F.; BUTLER IV, M. J.; HUNT, J. H. Can artificial habitats that mimic natural structures enhance recruitment of Caribbean spiny lobster. Special issue on artificial reef management. Fisheries, v.22, n.4, p. 24-27, 1997.
HIXON, M. A.; BEETS, J. P. Predation, prey refuges, and the structure of coral-reef fish assemblages. Ecological Monographys, v.63, p.77-101, 1993.
LINDBERG, W. J. Can science resolve the attraction-production issue? Special issue on artificial reef management. Fisheries, v.22, n.4, p. 10-33, 1997.
LOVE, M. S.; SCHROEDER, D. M.; LENARZ, W. Distribution of bocaccio (Sebastes paucispinis) and cowcod (Sebastes levis) around oil platforms and natural outcrops off California with implications for larval production. Bulletin of Marine Science, v.77, n.3, p. 397-408, 2005.
LOVE, M. S.; SCHROEDER, D. M.; LENARZ, W.; MacCALL, A.; BULL, A. S.; THORSTEINSON, L. Potential use of offshore marine structures in rebuilding an overfished rockfish species, bocaccio (Sebastes paucispinis). Fishery Bulletin, v.104, p. 383-390, 2006.
LOVE, M. S.; SCHROEDER, D. M.; NISHIMOTO, M. M. The ecological role of oil and gas production platforms and natural outcrops on fishes in southern and central California: a synthesis of information. Seattle, Washington, 98104, OCS Study: U. S. Department of the Interior, U. S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, 2003.
LOVE, M. S.; YOKLAVICH, M.; SCHROEDER, D. M. Demersal fish assemblages in the Southern California Bight based on visual surveys in deep water. Environmental Biology of Fish, v.84, p. 55-68, 2009.
MILLER, M. W. Using “Natural” reef ecology in artificial reef research: advancing artificial reef goals through better understanding of ecological processes. In: PROCEEDINGS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL REEFS, 17., (7th CARAH), 1999. p. 37-44.
OSENBERG, C. W.; MARY, C. M. St.; WILSON, J. A.; LINDBERG, W. J. A quantitative framework to evaluate the attraction-production controversy. ICES Journal of Marine Science, v.59, p. 214-221, 2002.
PAGE, H. M.; DUGAN, J. E.; SCHROEDER, D. M.; NISHIMOTO, M. M.; LOVE, M. S.; HOESTEREY, J. C. Trophic links and condition of a temperate reef fish: comparisons among offshore oil platform and natural reef habitats Marine Ecology Progress Series, v.344, p. 245–256, 2007.
PERKOL-FINKEL, S.; SHASHAR, N.; BENAYAHU, Y. Can artificial reefs mimic natural reef communities? The roles of structural features and age. Marine Environmental Research, v.61, p. 121-135, 2006.
PICKERING, H.; WHITMARSH, D. Artificial reefs and fisheries exploitation: a review of the “attraction versus production” debate, the influence of design and its significance for policy. Fisheries Research, v.31, p.39-59, 1997.
PITCHER, J. J.; SEAMAN, W. Jr. Petrarch’s Principle: how protected human-made reefs can help the reconstruction of fisheries and marine ecosystems. Fish and Fisheries, v.1, p. 73-81, 2000.
POLOVINA, J. J. Artificial reefs: nothing more than benthic fish aggregators. Calif. Coop. Oceanic Fisheries Invest. Rep., v. 30, p. 37-39, 1989a.
POLOVINA, J. J. Should anyone built artificial reefs? Bulletin of Marine Science, v.44, p. 1056-1057, 1989b.
POLOVINA, J. J. Fisheries applications and biological impacts of artificial habitats. In: SEAMAN, W.Jr.; SPRAGUE, L.M. (Eds.) Artificial Habitats for Marine and Freshwater Fisheries. San Diego: Academic Press, 1991. p. 153-176.
POLOVINA, J. J.; SAKAI, I. Impacts of artificial reefs on fishery production in Shimamaki, Japan. Bulletin of Marine Science, v.44, p. 997-1003, 1989.
PRATT, J. R. Artificial habitats and ecosystem restoration: Managing for future. Bulletin of Marine Science, v.55, n. 2-3, p. 268-275, 1994.
RECASENS, L.; LOMBARTE, A.; SÁNCHEZ, P. Teleostean fish assemblages in an artificial reef and natural rocky area in Catalonia (Northwestern Mediterranean): an ecomorphological approach. Bulletin of Marine Science, v.78, n.1, p. 71-82, 2006.
RILOV, G., BENAYAHU, Y. Fish assemblage on natural versus vertical artificial reefs: the rehabilitation perspective. Marine Biology, v.136, p. 931-942, 2000.
ROMERO, F. G. Artificial reefs: bane or boon to Philippine fisheries. Marine Life, v. 2, n.2, p. 4-7, 1996.
SANTOS, M. N.; MONTEIRO, C. C. Comparison of the catch and fishing yield from an artificial reef system and neighboring areas off Faro (Algarve, south Portugal). Fisheries Research, v.39, p. 55-65, 1998.
SEAMAN, W. What if everyone thought about reefs? Special issue on artificial reef management. Fisheries, v.22, n.4, p.5, 1997.
SEAMAN, W. Coastal artificial habitats for fishery and environmental management and scientific advancement. in: Tsukamoto, K., Kawamura, T., Takeuchi, T., Beard, T.D.Jr., Kaiser, M.J. (Eds.) FISHERIES FOR GLOBAL WELFARE AND ENVIRONMENT, WORLD FISHERIES CONGRESS, 5., 2008. p.335–349.
SEAMAN, W.; JENSEN, A. C. Purposes and practices of artificial reef evaluation. In: SEAMAN, William (Ed.). Artificial Reef Evaluation: With Application to Natural Marine Habitats. Boca Raton, Florida, USA: CRC Press, 2000. p.1-20.
SEMPERE, J. T. B.; ESPLÁ, A. A. R.; PALAZÓN, J. A. Análisis del efecto producción-atracción sobre la ictiofauna litoral de um arrecife artificial alveolar en la reserva marina de Tabarca (Alicante). Boletín Instituto Español de Oceanografía, v.17, n.1-2, p. 73-85, 2001.
SIMON, T. E. Peixes recifais: Comparação entre ambientes artificiais e naturais. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Departamento de Oceanografia e Ecologia, Vitória, 2010.
STEIMLE, F. W.; MEIER, M. H. What information do artificial reef managers really want from fishery science? Special issue on artificial reef management. Fisheries, v.22, n.4, p. 6-8, 1997.
TANGLEY. L. Enhancing coastal production: Do artificial shelters help or hurt Mexico’s valuable spiny lobster fishery? BioScience, v.37, p. 309-312, 1987.
YOKLAVICH, M. M.; GREENE, H. G.; CAILLIET, G. M.; SULLIVAN, D. E.; LEA, R. N.; LOVE, M. S. Habitat associations of deep-water rockfishes in a submarine canyon: an example of a natural refuge. Fishery Bulletin, v.98, p. 625-641, 2000.
WATANUKI, N.; GONZALES, B. J. The potential of artificial reefs as fisheries management tools in developing countries. Bulletin of Marine Science, v.78, n.1, p. 9-19, 2006.
WHITE, A. T.; LOKE, C. M.; De SILVA, M. W. R. N.; GUARIN, F. Y. Artificial reefs for marine habitat enhancement in Southeast Asia, Manila, Philippines. ICLARM Educational Series, v.11, 45 p., 1990.
WHITMARSH, D.; SANTOS, M. N.; RAMOS, J.; MONTEIRO, C. C. Marine habitat modification through artificial reefs off the Algarve (southern Portugal): An economic analysis of the fisheries and the prospects for management. Ocean and Coastal Management, v.51, p. 463-468, 2008.
WILSON, J.; OSENBERG, C. W.; MARY, C. M. ST.; WATSON, C. A.; LINDBERG, W. J. Artificial reefs, the attraction-production issue, and density dependence in marine ornamental fishes. Aquarium Sciences and Conservation, v.3, p. 95-105, 2001.
WILSON, K. D. P., LEUNG, A. W. Y., KENNISH, R. Restoration of Hong Kong fisheries through development of artificial reefs in marine protected areas. ICES Journal of Marine Science, v.59, p.157-163, 2002.
WITMAN, J. D.; DAYTON, P. K. Rocky Subtidal Communities. In: BERTNESS, M.D.; GAINES, S.D.; HAYy, M.E. (Eds.). Marine Community Ecology. Massachusetts: Sunderland, 2001. p.339-361
ZALMON, I. R.; NOVELLI, R.; GOMES, M. P.; FARIA, V. V. Experimental results of an artificial reef program on the Brazilian coast north of Rio de Janeiro. ICES, Journal of Marine Science, v.59, p.S83-S87, 2002.
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
The authors of the manuscript submitted to Vértices, hereby represented by the corresponding author, agree to the following terms:
The authors retain the copyright and grant Vértices the right of first publication.
At the same time the work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon its content for any legal purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited.
Authors will not receive any material reward for the manuscript and Essentia Editora will make it available online in Open Access mode, through its own system or other databases.
Authors are authorized to enter into additional contracts separately for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in Vértices (eg, publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to disseminate and distribute the post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF at online information sources (eg, in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any time after the first publication of the article by Vértices.
Essentia Editora may make normative, orthographic and grammatical changes in the originals in order to maintain the standard language, with the final consent of the authors.
The content and opinions expressed in the manuscript are the sole responsibility of the author (s).