Vertices Review Form

ORIGINALITY AND IMPORTANCE OF THE MANUSCRIPT

1. Is the investigated problem significant and important for the area?* 



 1. Comments:

 

 

2. Is the investigated problem clearly established?* 



 2. Comments:

 

 

SCOPE

3. Is the manuscript proposal in accordance with the editorial line of the Vertices magazine?* 


3. Comments: 

 

 

METHOD

4. Is the chosen research method appropriate?* 



 4. Comments: 

 

 

5. Was the research method well developed, validated (including data analysis)?* 



5. Comments: 

 

 

ETHICAL PRINCIPLES AND INTEGRITY OF THE INVESTIGATION

6. Does the manuscript present the integrity and ethical principles of research?* 




6. Comments: 

 

RESULTS

7. Is the data related to the proposed problem and is it presented / analyzed appropriately?* 



7. Comments: 

 

CONCLUSION
8. Are the discussion and conclusions supported by results and data?* 



8. Comments: 

 

LANGUAGE 

9. Is the text clear, coherent and well organized?* 



9. Comments: 

 

 

STRENGTHS

10. Comments: 

 

 

WEAKNESSES

11. Comments: 

 

 

ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS
(Suggestions for further experiments and / or analysis should be made in moderation, when really necessary. It is not the reviewer's job to extend the work beyond its current scope. They should be made when essential to support the claims made in the manuscript, considering only those that will strengthen the work).

12. Are there other studies mentioned in the Additional Comments (below) that are relevant and that can be cited in the manuscript? 


12. Comments: 

 

 

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

13. For the author (s): 

 

 

14. For Editors: 

 

 

GENERAL REVIEW: select the number that best represents your general evaluation (Notes 5 to 10)* 

 

 

PLEASE SELECT YOUR RECOMMENDATION FOR THE MANUSCRIPT*