Proposal of a risk matrix for risk management program in routine activities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19180/1809-2667.v23n22021p580-589Keywords:
Evaluation, Matrix, Danger, RiskAbstract
Professional activities can cause injury to the worker and their occurrence varies according to the probability and severity. In face of the need of establishing a model that can help the risk manager to prioritize actions in routine work activities, this study, through the application of legal and regulatory context, social security laws, regulatory and research norms, proposes the application of a matrix risk assessment for factors and / or sources of occupational risk. The matrix includes analysis of probability (unlikely, probable and highly probable), severity (without injury, minor injury, serious injury or occupational and fatal illness or permanent disability) and the number of workers and results in four types of graduation: Critical Risk, High, Moderate and Low. Critical Risk Activities, takes priority in actions to eliminate risk, followed by high, moderate and low risk. Critical Risk activities, beyond the routine of work, should include a risk analysis, when this is not required by any regulations. Critical and high-risk activities should be part of periodic inspections.Downloads
References
ABNT. ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS. NBR ISO 31010: Gestão de riscos: Técnicas para o processo de avaliação de riscos. Rio de Janeiro: ABNT, 2012. p. 96.
BERMUDES, W. L. Metodologia de avaliação de risco de acidentes na colheita florestal. 2018. 95 p. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências Florestais) – Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Centro de Ciências Agrárias e Engenharias, Jerônimo Monteiro, ES, 2018.
BORDAS, R. M. et al. Documentation of hazards and safety perceptions for mechanized logging operations in east central Alabama. Journal of agricultural safety and health, v. 7, n. 2, p. 113-123, 2001.
BRASIL. Lei n.º 8.213, de 24 de julho. Dispõe sobre os Planos de Benefícios da Previdência Social e dá outras providências. Brasília, jul. 1991.
BRASIL. Ministério da Economia. Secretária do Trabalho. Norma Regulamentadora 09: Programa de Prevenção de Riscos Ambientais, 2019.
BRASIL. Ministério da Economia. Secretária do Trabalho. Norma Regulamentadora 01: Disposições gerais e gerenciamento de riscos ocupacionais, 2020.
FLORIANI NETO, A. B.; RIBEIRO, M. C. P. Função tributária e acidentes laborativos: uma análise dos custos transacionais. Nomos, Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito da Universidade Federal do Ceará, v. 35, n. 2, 2016.
GADOW, K. V. Evaluating risk in forest planning models. Silva Fennica, v. 34, n. 2, p. 181-191, 2000.
ITANI, A.; VILELA JUNIOR, A. Meio ambiente & saúde: desafios para a gestão. InterfacEHS, Revista de Saúde, Meio Ambiente e Sustentabilidade, v. 1, n. 3, abr. 2007.
LEONARDO, A.; BRÁS, I. Avaliação de riscos profissionais em atividade industrial têxtil. Millenium, p. 37-51, 2010.
MANUELE, F. A. Prevention through design addressing occupational risks in the design and redesign processes. Professional Safety, v. 53, n. 10, 2008.
OLIVEIRA, G. N. et al. Correlação das categorias de classificação de risco com aspectos clínicos e desfechos. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, v. 24, p. 1-9, 2016.
OMS. ORGANIZAÇÃO MUNDIAL DA SAÚDE. Relatório mundial sobre a prevenção de acidentes rodoviários. Genebra: OMS, 2004.
PORTO, M. F. S. Cadernos de Saúde do Trabalhador: Análise de riscos nos locais de trabalho: conhecer para transformar. São Paulo: Kingraf, 2000. 43 p.
TRUCCO, P.; CAVALLIN, M. A quantitative approach to clinical risk assessment: The CREA method. Safety Science, v. 44, n. 6, p. 491-513, 2006.
VINODKUMAR, M. N.; BHASI, M. Safety management practices and safety behaviour: Assessing the mediating role of safety knowledge and motivation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, v. 42, n. 6, p. 2082-2093, 2010.
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors of the manuscript submitted to Vértices, hereby represented by the corresponding author, agree to the following terms:
The authors retain the copyright and grant Vértices the right of first publication.
At the same time the work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon its content for any legal purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited.
Authors will not receive any material reward for the manuscript and Essentia Editora will make it available online in Open Access mode, through its own system or other databases.
Authors are authorized to enter into additional contracts separately for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in Vértices (eg, publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to disseminate and distribute the post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF at online information sources (eg, in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any time after the first publication of the article by Vértices.
Essentia Editora may make normative, orthographic and grammatical changes in the originals in order to maintain the standard language, with the final consent of the authors.
The content and opinions expressed in the manuscript are the sole responsibility of the author (s).